Smart IP Analysis Tools
Two things decide whether IP work holds up: nothing gets missed, and every conclusion can be checked. The systems below handle the exhaustive half — docketing, monitoring, searching, cross-checking — so that professional judgment is applied to a complete and verifiable record. A US patent agent or attorney reviews and signs off on every output; nothing here is delivered as a machine conclusion.
Practice management
The internal system that keeps deadlines, filings, and documents under control.
Deadline Management
Statutory deadlines calculated by rule engine from USPTO event codes, with monitoring nodes checking status daily and tiered reminders before every due date.
Discuss a matterMatter & Document Management
Matters, clients, documents, correspondence, and billing in one system, with role-based access, audit logging, and a normalized party index for conflict checks.
Discuss a matterAnalysis workflows
Five workflows covering the patent lifecycle from pre-filing search through post-grant defense, plus trademark clearance.
Prior Art Search
A four-layer search across patent databases, common-law disclosures, and non-patent literature, ending in a report that says what to change before drafting — not a list of results.
Discuss a matterTranslation & 101/112
Converting an application written for Chinese practice into one that holds up under US examination — eligibility framing, §112 support, and claim structure, without introducing new matter.
Discuss a matterPre-Filing Review
A simulated examination before filing: formalities, §112 depth, case-law risk language, and statutory duties — so problems are fixed at draft cost rather than office action cost.
Discuss a matterLitigation Risk Analysis
A defendant-side risk report across seventeen analysis modules, organized along non-infringement, invalidity, procedure, and remedies, with defense priorities stated up front.
Discuss a matterTrademark Search
USPTO and common-law searching on parallel tracks, examiner-style variant generation, and a report that scores adoption risk from 1 to 10 with a clear recommendation.
Discuss a matterThe rule these tools follow
Machines do what is exhaustive and repetitive. People do what requires judgment and carries responsibility. Every citation is preserved with its source and date so a third party can independently confirm it, and findings that are established are reported separately from leads that still need corroboration.
These pages describe internal systems and professional workflows. They are general information and attorney advertising, not legal advice, and do not create an attorney-client or agent-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter.